Our Way of Life is the Public Health Crisis
Years ago, when I taught science to junior high school students, I would sometimes make an offhand remark to the effect of “Animals like us….” One or more students would respond, “Miss, we’re not animals!” I doubt my adolescent students were alone in misunderstanding their place in the biological kingdom.
The disconnect between humanity and the natural world, to
which every living thing belongs, characterizes all industrialized nations. Our
Western prioritization of artificial systems (economy) over natural systems
(ecology) laid the groundwork for our perilous conditions. We were in crisis
before this novel coronavirus pandemic, and we will continue to be in crisis
after. It’s a classic tragedy, with our hubris and ignorance leading to the
near-term extinction of our species, because our values and paradigms remain
rooted in fantasy instead of reality.
Ecological
degradation for economic growth
We should all find it ironic that the economic condition
which likely caused zoonotic diseases such as Covid-19 is the very same state
to which we are desperate to return. The main theory of transmission of this
novel virus to humans suggests that the virus resided in bats, spread from them
to an intermediary creature (probably the pangolin), then to humans through a
“wet market” in China.
Because of their commercial exploitation for meat or for the
use of their scales in traditional medicine, pangolins across
the globe face extinction. They represent just another of the species that
human enterprise has threatened and endangered, increasing our planetary biodiversity crisis.
In the case of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), our close association with
wild animals like pangolins, who carry pathogens yet unknown to human
immunoresponse, threatens us all.
An unsanitary exotic meat market is simply one distinct
situation that poses a pathogenic risk to human health. Our encroachment into
previously wild areas of the planet for development, resource extraction,
industrialization, and agriculture has brought about other recent novel viruses
and diseases such as SARS, MERS, H1N1, Ebola, and AIDS. Epidemiologists,
virologists, ecologists, and all types of scientists who study the natural
environment had predicted the emergence of
such a pandemic, and know that the potential exists for far worse,
due to our over-consumptive economy. Our ecosystem disruption and proximity to
wild species form the root cause of the viral pandemic, yet our focus remains
on mitigation and excludes prevention.
Artificial constructs
and artifice
This coronavirus has not only laid bare the fissures and
vulnerabilities in our society, it has exposed our way of life - dictated by
our political economy - for the lie it is. It should be obvious that nothing
has to be this way. It is all an illusion. We operate under a system of
man-made laws that can be as easily dismantled as they were erected. Economics
may have rules, but any and all of these rules can be broken and altered in any
way we please.
When so-called
leaders claim we cannot end homelessness, poverty, student debt, lack of access
to medical care, rampant economic exploitation and inequality, remember this: "There's an infinite
amount of cash in the Federal Reserve."
Last week on 60
Minutes, Neel Kashkari, the official who managed the Wall Street bailout of
2008, explicitly leaked a key truth, as so many of the powerful often do when
they talk long enough. Of course, in 2008 as now, that money created out of nothing
is mainly available via the powers-that-be to supply themselves and their
plutocratic friends. Sure, desperate citizens have been allocated a pittance
that cannot even cover one month’s rent in most regions, but those crumbs were
dispensed just to quash potential unrest.
At any time the
Federal Reserve could have and can make their assets available to eliminate our
socio-economic ills. But providing cash to people, such as a Universal Basic
Income (UBI) to ensure them the necessities of existence, would demonstrate
that our economic system of capitalism is just a construct. It would show that
the capricious, often arbitrary rules of our political economy were established
to serve the plutocrats, to maintain the profiteering of the wealthy and the
servitude of the rest.
A kindergartner
can see the obvious immorality and artifice in providing billions to
corporations and industries that pollute the planet and exploit its resources
and employees, rather than providing those billions to people in need. For
example, Boeing, who knowingly allowed the deaths of hundreds of people with
their flawed 737 Max aircraft will benefit, as will so many expendable
industries that contribute to the continuous degradation of the biosphere and
of human health.
Natural versus artificial systems
While the economy
operates via manmade laws, science operates via natural laws. We continually uncover
more information about scientific laws and properties. Though much remains
unknown and though we constantly intervene to try to circumvent them, natural,
scientific laws never change.
To that end, we
humans are biological beings, not economic beings - organisms, not workers. We
are not Homo economicus; we
are Homo sapiens. We were not born to find occupations in a
consumer capitalist economy. In fact, for most of the 200,000 year history of
our species, we did not. Yet, we have been spending centuries now mostly
ignoring physical and biological reality. We cling to the
entirely synthetic construct of capitalism that cannot help but degrade our
biosphere and destroy our physical well-being.
What a global
pandemic helps us realize is that we are all alike, all valuable, and all
deserving of basic rights. As organisms, we need to maintain homeostasis, which
we do through having proper water, food, shelter, and clothing. Those of us
lacking these necessities find ourselves more vulnerable to every sort of
external antagonist. Our basic human requirements should not be contingent upon
jobs that elites and economists deem valuable.
Our economic
system has left so many in crisis. Millions are in dire need. Millions more
possess little or no reserves should the artificial economic system grind to a
halt. Thus, when confronted with an infection from the natural system, our
pre-existing crisis turns colossal in scale. And the same companies and
industries that our leaders want to save after this pandemic are those that
contribute overwhelmingly to climate catastrophe, biodiversity loss,
toxification of ecosystems, and untold numbers modern human illnesses. In turn,
these ailments compromise our immune systems, leaving us vulnerable to
novel pathogens like the coronavirus.
Our precarious
predicament is a product of our own creation.
Platitudes, princesses, and Pollyannas
The new mantra of the pandemic era is “We’re all in this
together.” Since when? Since two weeks ago? If we were always in this together,
we would have fashioned an egalitarian society that serves everyone’s basic
needs instead of greed - not for this moment, but forever. We wouldn’t have
empty, extra homes while others sleep rough. We wouldn’t have hungry citizens
while others feast. We wouldn’t have multi-millionaires and billionaires while
others can barely cobble together an existence.
Since the coronavirus pandemonium began, the comfort class
started losing its shit, almost literally. The first thing that compliant
consumers did amidst the chaos and uncertainty was to go shopping, and the
first thing they bought up was toilet paper. Because of shelter-in-place
orders, hoarding of food and supplies by those with the most left stores barren
of necessities for others, particularly those who have little expendable wealth
to stock up.
As it stands, the financially privileged have little idea
what to do with themselves when they can no longer go to their gyms, salons,
bars, restaurants, entertainment venues, etc. Internet and television
commentators opine about how to keep ourselves occupied and how to sustain our
profligate lifestyles while indoors. The comfortable also lament the loss of
their travel, vacations, and extravagant festivities.
On the other hand, the no-so-comfortable see little
difference in their lives. The unemployed and underemployed, who could not
afford such luxuries, stay home and search for their elusive work, as usual,
remaining as frugal as possible to maintain a roof over their heads and food to
eat.
Those with no food or shelter face their typical inhumane
struggle for survival amid a more acute existential threat to their lives. In
some places, the homeless are being temporarily housed for public health
protection, and we are left to wonder why this cannot be accomplished all the
time (hint: it can) and why we
only care when their precarity directly threatens us.
Mass media reports showcase the growing list of “heroes”
like healthcare, grocery, sanitation, and postal workers, and graciously
highlight the volunteers who help those in need, though mainly fail to address
the economic insecurity many of them live under..
For seemingly the first time, some media have finally
encountered the woeful inadequacies of our corrupted for-profit medical care
system, as well as of other systems that should serve the public good. They
cover scoundrels trying to capitalize off of everyone’s uncertainty and fear.
They look upon these opportunistic immoral deeds as uncouth now. But they
forget that in “normal” times they would describe such failing systems as the
best in the world, and such unethical people as entrepreneurial, with great
business acumen.
When confronted with some of the unpleasant truths about our
way of life, the media like to say “This isn’t America.” I’m afraid it is.
Pausing – or better, stopping - for people
and the planet
Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, in defending his stay-at-home
orders for the state, said that although people want to return to their
livelihoods, they won’t have livelihoods without lives. We should take that one
step further: We don’t have lives without our life support system (our
biosphere), which continues to be ignored as we focus all of our eyes and
energy exclusively on the viral pandemic.
In that vein, the Trump administration has suspended EPA regulations and
environmental protections during this emergency. Consequently, the
very industries and economic conditions that fostered the eruption of this
pandemic are now being allowed to continue without oversight.
The stoppage of all unessential services uncovered further
truths about our way of life in the context of environmental sustainability.
While a headline from The Onion satirically
stated, “Thousands of Formerly
Endangered White Rhinos Flood City Streets Mere Days After Humans Quarantined
Indoors,” they were not far from the truth. In reality, wildlife returned to the
cleaner waterways in the Venice canals. Air pollution and greenhouse
gas emissions decreased dramatically throughout the U.S. and across
the globe, as unnecessary transportation, industry, and commerce halted. The
United Nations even called for a global ceasefire during the course of this
pandemic, which not only ends immediate deaths, but suspends the immense pollution stemming from
military operations.
Although one of the unfortunate ecological outcomes of the
pandemic is the waste from the increased used of disposable products to which we
have become accustomed, we could learn that there are many less wasteful ways
to keep sanitized and protected. But overall, we are experiencing large
positive environmental effects of our global pause.
The combination of systemic change and collective individual
change revealed the obvious path to global sustainability: When it comes to
superfluous, frivolous and even outright malevolent consumer and industrial
processes, we simply must stop.
And we can.
Our lives are ultimately governed by the laws of nature. The
common notion that the cure (slowing or stopping of the economy) is worse than
the problem (the viral pandemic) rests on the erroneous fallacy that capitalism
cannot be altered or even obliterated. As long as citizens have the ability to
have their basic needs met – and we know that this could easily be accomplished
– we have solutions to our environmental emergencies. We just refuse to acknowledge
them.
Business as usual and a return to
(ab)normal
Normal
is not having enough medical equipment for predicted and predictable
emergencies.
Normal is 553K homeless on any given night in America.
Normal
is almost 115 million American
households lacking food security.
Normal is nearly 30 million people without
access to medical care in the U.S.
Normal
is calling poisoned food “conventional” while charging a premium for food
without unnecessary toxic contamination.
Normal
is throwing out and burning
clothing rather than giving it to people who need to be clothed.
Normal
is some people having multiple homes while others have none.
Normal
is lying, prevaricating, opportunistic politicians.
Normal
is blaming the poor, but not the rich or corporations, for misfortunes not of
their own making.
Normal
is bailing out Wall Street and corporations for their own malfeasance.
Normal
is ignoring people in need.
Normal
is narcissism and self-interest rather than humility and altruism.
Normal
is "I" over
"We"
Normal
is synthetic toxics running rampant through our ecosystems and through
ourselves.
Normal
is greenhouse gas emissions increasing exponentially.
Normal
is climate chaos.
Normal
is ecological emergency.
Normal
is omnicide.
And yet we all want to
return to it.
The time for radical
change is now
In devastation, there is opportunity
(56:35). Right now, as per usual and as described in Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine, opportunities are
being exploited by the rich and powerful, by corporations and capitalists.
Instead, we masses could finally rise up.
Climate and
ecological scientists keep warning us that radical change is necessary to save
humanity. We have proven that we are able to effect radical change overnight.
The time for radical change to a more equitable, just, and sustainable society
is now. We have changed our lives and our industrial processes drastically to deal
with an acute viral emergency; we can likewise change our lives fundamentally
to deal with our chronic ecological emergency.
As so many have said so many times before, business as usual
is no longer an option because business as usual brought us to the precarious
place where we stand. There is no more wiggle room. Only radical changes to our
entire global social, political, and economic systems (our artificial,
alterable systems) will render the changes that our global ecosystems (our
natural, immutable systems) require to survive our concurrent planetary
emergencies.
We made this economic system quite recently. The stock
market only began a few hundred years ago. Compared to our geological
timeframe, it is all a modern historical phenomenon. We can unmake it.
In the short term, we could bailout citizens not companies.
Any funds provided to corporations should be investments, and we should own
these corporations like they have always owned us. (But really, we should just
let them fend for themselves like we all have to do.) We could nationalize
essential services. We could enact the precautionary principle to prevent
future environmental health crises. In the long term, we could introduce
prevention and preparation to enhance our resilience. We could curtail
gratuitous endeavors. We could share our resources and provide for
everyone. And we could try our best to operate according to the
physical and biological laws - i.e., reality - that govern our human, animal
existence.
Unfortunately, we will likely just listen to our feckless
leaders who tell us to dig in our heels until we return to abnormalcy, and
continue on
our psychopathic onmicidal way.
Our current way of life is not innate, not biologically
absolute. Because it threatens the future of all human life, it is the largest
public health crisis on the face of the planet. And just like the coronavirus
pandemic, we could try to stop it. I’m not holding my breath.
Kristine Mattis holds
a Ph.D. in Environment and Resources.
Email: k_mattis@outlook.com Twitter: @kristinemattis
Comments
When will Dr. Mattis and other academics take strategic responsibility for the ideas they espouse? When will they stop simply trashing capitalism and the greedy, and find concrete ways to move beyond them? Having witnessed their cowardice and compliance for decades, I'm not holding my breath.
You can make assumptions, but you really do not know my life. I have sacrificed much (like career, etc.) to speak the words I do, and I have not been complacent or compliant. I don't reside in an ivory tower and I live in precarity because of it. I try to live what I speak. Meanwhile, lots of people do give a shit about usurping capitalism, but if it were so easy, it would have been accomplished ages ago. Still, we fight where and how we can, and I think many of us are open to more suggestions.
In solidarity,
Kristine