Selling Out is Not Sacrifice
The evils of
capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and evils of racism.
You show me a
capitalist; I’ll show you a bloodsucker.
Has enough time elapsed that we can finally speak frankly
about all of the hoopla over a cynical sneaker endorsement? OK. Then I have to
ask: Have we all lost our minds?? Am I to understand that our civilization has
“progressed” to the point where supposed social change is aided by the
manipulative marketing of overpriced, sweatshop-produced apparel?
Remember sweatshops? Or are they just a faddish social cause
from the 90s? Charles Kernaghan of the Institute for Global Labour and Human
Rights calls the conditions created by multinational corporations like Nike,
and faced by workers in their factories, "the science of
exploitation." Those who
endorse the likes of such corporations stand complicit in their evildoings.
Courtesy: Oxfam Austrailia |
Just because the heinous global mistreatment of garment (and
other) workers has become little more than fodder for comedians in the current
zeitgeist does not mean that we have solved the issue of sweatshop labor or
that it is any less atrocious. On the contrary, near-slave wages, child labor,
unsafe working conditions, and harassment still run rampant in factory work
around the world and in the United
States. A new era of slavery in the U.S. now exists in prisons. Unpaid
and barely paid laborers - many of whom are black victims of racism, police
brutality, and injustice, and untold numbers of whom may be innocent of their
alleged crimes - recently
struck to protest unjust conditions. But indeed, even outside of prison,
poor working conditions and poverty wages abound. Senator Bernie Sanders just
introduced the “Stop Bezos Act,” a nod to the horrific labor practices in Jeff
Bezos’ Amazon fulfillment centers. The Act seeks to rectify multibillionaire
corporations’ exploitation of workers, whose wages remain so low that we
taxpayers are forced to make up the difference via public assistance, while the
corporate capitalists soak up all of the profits.
Anti-sweatshop Nike boycott - 1990s |
It cannot be emphasized enough that human civilization is
currently enveloped in two major catastrophic emergencies. The first is economic
and social inequality, to which people of color bear the harshest burdens. The
second is massive ecological degration – caused by climate change, toxic
contamination, pollution, loss of biodiversity, and unfettered species
extinction. Actually, people of color bear the greatest environmental burdens
as well. The root causes of both catastrophes lie with corporate capitalism,
which exploits people and the environment relentlessly to profit the most
craven, exorbitantly wealthy members of society.
The apparel industry, like all corporate capitalist
endeavors, overproduces frivolous and often unnecessary products, contributing
to all of the ills described above. In addition to the unbridled inequality
resulting from labor exploitation, corporate capitalism is marked by ethical,
social, and environmental plunder.
If it isn’t already obvious, this talk about corporate
capitalism and garment sweatshops arises from the unveiling of former NFL
player Colin Kaepernick’s commercial for Nike. I, like many others, fully
supported Kaepernick’s silent, symbolic protest against American racism and
policy brutality through his “taking a knee” during the national anthem at
football games, I also sympathized with his career sacrifice to stand for his
beliefs. Now, I now find myself seemingly stranded on a desert island in my
denunciation of his disappointing turn. There is nothing heroic in endorsing a
multinational corporation. There is nothing heroic in receiving millions of
dollars from an extractive, exploitative company, no matter what good those
millions of dollars might be used for. At best, it is a zero sum game.
Even if Kaepernick donates all of his Nike earnings toward
ending police brutality and promoting racial justice in the U.S., he would just be calling it
even to compensate for the exploitation of other people – mainly people of
color – and natural resources stemming from the manufacture and sale of Nike
products. This is not helpful towards progress in our global society nor is it
helpful toward moving us away from the corporate capitalistic practices that
sow the seeds of racism and police brutality in the first place.
Reading the analyses and social media chatter about
Kaepernick, not just this past week but over the course of the past two years
of his protest, I struggle to find much discussion of the actual causes he
protested against. Instead, the right wing reframed his protest as one that
trampled upon U.S.
patriotism and the U.S.
military. Of course, that is a completely phony, dishonest assessment, but
nevertheless, very little has been said about the continued slaughtering of
innocent black victims by bloodthirsty, racist police officers, and certainly
less still has changed with regard to action against these injustices. And
while loads of so-called liberals and progressives jump on the bandwagon of
support for Kaepernick and sometimes for Nike, no one but Martin Luther King,
Jr. appears to understand the connection between the evils of capitalism and
the evils of militarism and racism.
As the late
great Bill Hicks might
have suggested, Nike went after the black solidarity dollar and the white
guilt dollar. Marketers turn everything into a dollar sign.
If you think,
Kaepernick’s Nike endorsement is, overall, a positive move, you might just want
to watch The Corporation.
As this documentary so astutely points out, the corporation is a psychopath.
Enabling psychopaths is always ill-advised.
Some people defend Kaepernick and Nike with the argument
that they are bringing awareness to an important cause. Raising awareness of a
cause seems to be an end in and of itself nowadays, and the means by which the
awareness is raised, however corrupt, remains neglected. Here are the facts:
Nike does not care about black people. It does not care about ethics, or social
or environmental causes. It does not care about you or me. It cares about
money. If you are responding to the platitudes in Kaepernick’s ad, if the
syrupy sentiments are tugging at your heartstrings, you have been manipulated
by marketing. People think that Kaepernick’s Nike ad is a sincere political
statement rather than a commercial. There was a time when we could discern
between the two. People are projecting their own beliefs, insecurities, and
rationalities onto this campaign, when in fact, it is nothing more than a
contrived and disingenuous sales pitch. If you have bought Nike products to be
on the right side of justice, you have been used. These emotional machinations
are precisely what advertising is for. Nike’s online
sales increased by 31% after it rolled out Kaepernick’s campaign. Mission accomplished.
Awareness is merely the most minuscule beginning of
attempting to redress social ills. A clever, cliché-filled advertising campaign
never helps anything but the bottom-line of the corporation doing the
marketing. Marketing and consumerism are the problem, not the solution.
Advertising is not a political act, it is a financial one. Social change never
came from marketing or consumerism and it never will.
The ills of society that have been conquered thus far were
not overcome by the pragmatists or the centrists who rationalized a bad action
for the sake of a good action. Historically, social change resulted from the
radicals and the purists, the unheralded masses who worked their asses off, fighting
for ethical issues, and willingly forsaking their careers, their reputations,
their financial stability, and often even their own lives for the greater good.
(See people like Cynthia McKinney, the first black woman to run for President,
or the heroes at Black Agenda Report, including Glen Ford, Margaret Kimberley,
and Bruce Dixon, for just a few modern examples of true courage.) Justice
cannot occur when one substitutes one oppression or injustice for the sake of
another.
Remember selling out? Remember when making a great deal of
money from a questionable organization or company was considered a bad thing?
The notion of selling out seems to have been swept away with the new millennium
and perhaps, according to some, with the millennial
generation. However, just as sweatshops still exist, so does selling out.
Sacrificing your career for your principles is courageous;
acting as a representative to a billion-dollar global corporation is simply
selling out. Kaepernick spent two years as a courageous representative of
social justice, now he has become a sell-out.
Perhaps we should urge him to reconsider his actions.
Perhaps Kaepernick could explore more deeply the consequences of promoting
corporate capitalism, which has placed humanity at a precipice both
economically and ecologically. Selling out one’s integrity and bravery to that
very entity is a move in the exact wrong direction. The fact that Kaepernick
has taken such a misguided step is discouraging; the fact that so many support
his step demonstrates just how wrongheaded we all are in our approaches to
solving the many problems that ail us.
Kristine Mattis holds
a Ph.D. in Environment and Resources. She is no relation to the mad-dog general.
Email: k_mattis@outlook.com
Comments